On a telephone survey the other day I was asked to give my "ethnic identity". I said "American". The lady said that is not a choice, I explained it is what I choose, and she went on to the next question dismissing me. ( it'd be interesting to see what she wrote in her notes about what she thought about me...)
There is something made nowadays about the demise of the "white majority". I might have these numbers slightly off, but I believe it is accepted that by around 2018 or so the US population under 25 will not have a white majority, and that by around 2030 or so the entire population will be that way. It belies changing voter demographics and therefore new political winds.
So, why might this be?
I have thought about something that might make this less relevant, and might actually make this "fact" less valid.
Over the last 30-40 years we have undergone a shift in the attitude toward interracial marriage. Before this shift it was unacceptable (in fact, in some places illegal) for white people to marry black people. This extended somewhat to other "races", such as Oriental, and some to Hispanics as well.
Nowadays there is no limitation, and though there might be some lingering attitudes against it, the vast majority of Americans see no limits to the marriage between races or people groups.
Interesting, though, is a continuation of the past practice that was parallel to the prohibition of interracial marriage. I don't know where it began, but it was certainly true that during segregation times, the determination of what "color" a person claims is set by a norm that if, for example, a black and white couple have a baby, the baby is automatically black. If you see a black and white couple, I'd be surprised if you could find a single instance where the baby is identified as white. Today, there is a determination that if a person is 1/16th Native American (your great-great grandfather was Native American), then you are Native American.
What is most interesting to me about this fact, is that these "norms" were put in place to sustain segregation, yet in today's integrated "color blind" society, we accept them as the standard to measure our racial identity.
It seems to me that the erasure of the limits on interracial marriage are significant in the shrinkage of the "white majority". It seems it is not equally valid to argue that the growth of the formerly minority populations should significantly affect this fact. The real fact is that the identity of racial groups per se is becoming less distinct, because a child of a black and white couple is actually neither black or white, they choose their identity rather than have one by unavoidable fact. Their "black" genes will have no greater impact on their offspring's genetics than their "white" genes.
A better step in this evolution of equality-for-all would be to have no recognition for color, or race. Our American Melting Pot took a real step forward in the erasure of interracial marriage limits, so why don't we implement the result by having a new "ethnic identity" choice to check "American"?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment